«Оборот обезьян» или интересные схемы «кидалова», о которых нужно знать

[YUU]

Сообщение от Fidel Kastro

Вы на процедуры в физиотерапию придите и объявите персоналу, что они занимаются шарлатанством.

Часть процедур, действительно, бесполезна, хорошо, если не вредна.

[Desertboy]

Сообщение от YUU

Часть процедур, действительно, бесполезна, хорошо, если не вредна.

Странно это звучит из ваших уст, человека рекомендующего вешать фен кондиционера "верх ногами"!

[Виталий Нам]

Сообщение от YUU

Тут не электролиз пихают, а облучение воды электромагнитными полями различных длин волн и частот.

гугл и ячейка Мейера в помощь...

если у Вас в кране течет грязная вода,которая не соответствует нормам указанным на приборе -- это значит виновата местная СЭС,а не производитель...

[MONSTER666]

Сообщение от Timur Vakhabov

Насчёт "живой" и "мёртвой" воды, то это понятие существует давным давно, получается процессом электролиза, например.

Не существует "живой" или "мертвой" воды. Гугл и вики вам в помощь.
Ололо, ссылка на воду - это что МАЛАХОВ+?)))))))

И давно МАЛАХОВ этот любитель отведать собственной мочи стал... эээ... авторитетом?



===========================================

Сообщение от Виталий Нам

гугл и ячейка Мейера в помощь.

О! Опять вечные двигатели попёрли...

[Виталий Нам]

Сообщение от MONSTER666

О! Опять вечные двигатели попёрли...

также как и индукционные нагреватели и СВЧ нагрев.

[MONSTER666]

Сообщение от Виталий Нам

также как и индукционные нагреватели и СВЧ нагрев.

У них не 100% КПД.

[Виталий Нам]

Сообщение от MONSTER666

У них не 100% КПД.

а про 100% КПД не я писал.
у Мейера принцип в том,что можно затратить меньше энергии чем в электролизере.
и вывод однозначный -- китайские устройства работают,просто китайцы не виноваты,что их приборы используются не по назначению.

[MONSTER666]

Сообщение от Виталий Нам

у Мейера принцип в том,что можно затратить меньше энергии чем в электролизере.

Его схема не работают, и его судили за мошенничество. Оштрафовали на 25K $.
Ваше Мейер, не более чем мошенник.

Скрытый текст:

Sunday Times Innovation 1 Dec. 96 (http://www.sunday-times.co.uk)

End of road for car that ran on Water

American court finds inventor of water-powered car is guilty of fraud.
Report by Tony Edwards

It appears to be the end of the road for maverick inventor Stanley Meyer and
his water-powered car after a recent American court verdict.

The car was a wonderful, if unlikely, dream while it lasted, offering a
pollution-free future powered by a limitless source of energy. But the
dream was shattered when Meyer was found guilty of fraud after his Water
Fuel Cell was tested before an Ohio judge.
It is rare for an inventor to be prosecuted for an invention that does not
work, but Meyer's problem was that he had been selling "dealerships",
offering investors the "right to do business'' in Water Fuel Cell tech-
nology in anticipation of the day when water would power anything From
domestic boilers to cars and aircraft.
But recently two suspicious investors could not wait for that day to dawn
and sued Meyer to get their money back.
Meyer defended, maintaining his long-held claim that the Water Fuel Cell was a truly
revolutionary invention that could split water into its two constituent
gases of hydrogen and oxygen far more efficiently than conventional
electrolysis. The secret, he said, was to "resonate" electricity at a very
high voltage through water and so "fracture" the hydrogen/oxygen molecular
bond. This, he claimed, opened the way for a car which would "run on wat-
er", powered simply by a car battery. The car would even run for ever since
the energy needed to continue the "fracturing" was so low that the bat-
tery could be recharged: from the engine's dynamo.

Meyer claimed to have adapted a 1.6-litre Volkswagen Dune Buggy to run on
water. He replaced the sparkplugs with "injectors" which, he said, sprayed
water as a fine mist in a "resonant cavity" where it was bombarded by a
succession of high-voltage electrical pulses. He claimed this instantly
converted the water into a mixture of hydrogen and oxygen that could be
combusted in the cylinders, driving the pistons just as in an ordinary
petrol engine.
One of the experts due toexamine the car was Michael Laughton, professor
of electrical engineering at Queen Mary and Westfield University, London,
but he was not allowed to see it. "Although Meyer had known about our
visit weeks in advance, when we arrived he made some lame excuse about why
the car wasn't working, so it was impossible to evaluate it," said
Laughton.
However, the one thing Meyer had built that appeared to work was his Water
Fuel Cell, and it was this device that the Ohio judge called as evidence in
the recent lawsuit.
The cell had been the centrepiece of Meyer's sales pitches. It was a
transparent cylinder of water inside which was a core of stainless steel
electrodes. When plugged into an electrical supply,the cell bubbled away
merrily, producing apparently copious amounts of gas that Meyer ignited
through a welding torch.To the layman it was an impressive performance and
hundreds of small investors signed up, but it did not impress three expert
witnesses in court.
They decided that there was nothing revolutionary about the cell at all and
that it was simply using conventional electrolysis.
Meyer was found guilty of "gross and egregious fraud" and ordered to repay
the investors their $25,000 (£15,000).

[Виталий Нам]

Сообщение от MONSTER666

Ваше Мейер, не более чем мошенник.

But recently two suspicious investors could not wait for that day to dawn
and sued Meyer to get their money back.

[MONSTER666]

Виталий Нам,
И?
Заявления Мейера не получили независимого подтверждения, и суд штата Огайо признал его виновным в «наглом мошенничестве».